Social housing assistance
Updated: 16 October 2009
Government housing assistance remained constant, numbers of applicants for government housing grew, and the time to house people on the lists increased
The two main ways1 that the government assists low-income families into affordable housing are the Accommodation Supplement2 (AS) and Income-Related Rents3 (IRR). At the end of September 2009, there were 309,932 AS recipients and 61,111 IRR tenants.
Figure 14 shows government expenditure4 on social housing assistance as a percentage of total housing sector expenditure from the September 2005 quarter to the March 2009 quarter.
The level of total government housing assistance as a percentage of total housing contribution to GDP remained unchanged at 7.6 percent between the December 2008 quarter and the March 2009 quarter. IRR assistance remained unchanged at 2.6 percent of total housing contribution to GDP between the December 2008 and March 2009 quarters. AS rose slightly from 4.9 percent to 5.1 percent of total housing contribution to GDP over the same period.
Figure 14: Government housing assistance as a percentage of the contribution of housing to gross domestic product (to March 2009)

Source: Department of Building and Housing, Housing New Zealand Corporation, Ministry of Social Development and Statistics New Zealand
Total government housing assistance (as measured by IRR and AS) increased from $375.7 million in the March 2009 quarter to $391.8 million in the June 2009 quarter. Total government housing assistance in the June 2009 quarter was 13.7 percent more than the $344.5 million provided in the June 2008 quarter.
Over the March 2009 quarter, the proportion of IRR tenants not receiving a benefit fell from 21.3% to 20.7%. This was the only significant change in the composition of benefits for IRR tenants, as shown inFigure 15.
Figure 15: Parent benefits received by income-related rent tenants (to March 2009)

Source: Housing New Zealand Corporation
Figure 16 shows that there were no significant changes in the composition of benefits received by AS recipients in the March 2009 quarter, when compared with the December 2008 quarter, although the spread in the second to top area (for Unemployment Benefits recipients) has been widening quickly since reaching its narrowest point in the June 2008 quarter. This is likely to continue.
Figure 16: Other benefits received by accommodation supplement recipients (to March 2009)

Source: Ministry of Social Development
Waiting list priority for Housing New Zealand Corporation housing is determined by several factors5, and applicants are divided into four groups that reflect different levels of need. The groupings are referred to as:
As shown in Figure 179 , the combined A and B priority waiting lists increased 7.3 percent from 4,122 applicants in May 2009 to 4,422 in September 2009. Priority A applicants increased by 41.9 percent over the same period, and are up 14.1 percent in the year to September 2009. Priority B applicants also continued to climb, up 5.3 percent between May 2009 and September 2009, and up 6.8 percent for the year.
Figure 17: Waiting List for Housing New Zealand Corp Dwellings – Number of Households A and B Priority (to September 2009)

Source: Housing New Zealand Corporation
As shown in Figure 18, average waiting times for both Priority A and B applicants have fallen by about ten days since the start of the year. For September 2009, Priority A applicants waited on average 30 days, compared with 38 days in January 2009, but still higher than 23 days in September 2008. Priority B applicants wait on average 81 days, down from 90 days in January 2009, but still up compared with 72 of September 2008. Taken together, the data suggests a slow increase in demand for Housing New Zealand Corporation properties, slightly beyond what the Corporation can meet in the short run.
Figure 18: Waiting List for Housing New Zealand Corp Dwellings – Average Waiting Time (to September 2009)

5. The factors are used to determine housing needs are: affordability; adequacy; suitability; accessibility; and sustainability.